A story within a
story within a story
Yesterday after the Jo-Mama Book
Club met online from 9 to 12 to discuss Lion
in Winter (yes, the 1966 play!), I headed for Oakland for the monthly get-together
of what I call the all-star KAST (Kathy, Suzy, Tina), and after hearing about
Kathy’s cruise of the Caribbean with Irish music on board and Suzy’s difficult
co-worker and eating a delicious Mexican soup, Kathy asked, “Have you heard
from Dana?” and Suzy and I both responded with a defeated “No.” She didn’t return our calls. She didn’t pick up for us.
“But she did call a while back to
get Aunt Virginia’s telephone number,”
I added.
Aunt Virginia is the last living of the family I found in the mid-1980s--the family Mom didn't know she had--and I wrote about that and about Dana back in December in what I called “Awful
Good.”
In
a study of men and what led to their feeling of fulfillment or non-fulfillment,
one man credited his mother for the fact that his life had been happy and
fulfilling. He described his mother as
warm, accepting, and encouraging of creativity. Another man blamed his mother for the fact
that his life had been disappointing and his dreams unfulfilled. He described his mother as cold, rejecting,
and rigid. These men were brothers. They had the same mother. But of course, no two siblings really
do. So much is in perspective. So much is in a “match.”
So as my sister Dana and I were leaving Aegis after Dana’s
first visit with Mom in a couple of years, the woman at the front desk asked,
“How did it go?” and Dana and I answered simultaneously.
“Awful!” Dana said.
“Good!” I said.
This wasn’t the first time Dana and
I had a totally different reaction. One
of the times was when I was doing a search for our mother’s biological family
so we would know our medical background.
I loved our Grandparents Robison, the ones who’d adopted Mom, and
considered them our “real” grandparents.
But our brother David had epilepsy, and our sister Missy had a speech
impediment. Dana, Missy, and I had
children. We needed to know our biological make-up.
I’d done most of the investigative work, but I couldn’t have done it
without the original, supposedly sealed, birth certificate, which Dana had
gotten in Kansas City, Missouri, where she had gone with her husband to a
psychiatrists’ convention. She’ d walked
in and filled out the form with Mom’s original name, Natalie Virginia Stephens,
which was on the adoption document we’d had for years along with Nadine
Virginia Robison, the name given her by her adoptive parents.
The clerk handed the original birth
certificate over to Dana without a question.
Apparently it hadn’t been sealed after all!
Thanks to Dana, we now had the name
of our mother’s birth mother, Helen Stephens, and her date of birth. That made possible all the rest of the
investigation I did. But this was in
1982, before the Internet, so the process of the investigation involved going
to the Federal Archives, getting microfilm, looking at all the federal census
reports since 1896, sending for telephone books, and making calls. After months of doing this fascinating,
all-absorbing “detective work,” I located a woman I thought was an important
link, and Dana and I made plans to fly to Norman, Oklahoma to meet her. Dana would fly in from Chicago. I’d fly in from San Francisco. We’d meet at 7:00 PM at the motel I’d
reserved,
I turned down a $500 voucher when
the airlines were overbooked on my flight because it would mean arriving two
hours later, and I didn’t want to be late for Dana. But she wasn’t there at 7:00 PM. She didn’t come in at all that night, and I
was worried. There were no cell phones
in 1982 (except for the one Robert Wagner used to call Stephanie Powers in a television series, “Hart to Hart,” about rich people who had such devices). I kept calling her home, but the line was
always busy. This was also the time
before cell phones. I didn’t sleep at
all that night. Then the following
morning Dana came in with her husband, who’d driven them down to Norman,
Oklahoma from Chicago. It hadn’t occurred
to her to call me to let me know that she had changed her plans and wouldn’t be
coming in until the following day. But
that bothered me less than what she said after we met the woman I thought was a
link. The woman denied knowing anything
about Helen Stephens.
“Tina thinks that woman is lying,
that she’s really related to us, but I can tell she’s not. Tina’s wrong.”
That “Tina’s wrong” dismissiveness
stung.
It was such a put down that it felt
really good when, continuing to link this woman to our past, I found three
sisters and a brother my mother never knew she had. I also found a brother, no longer living,
whom our mother’s birth mother had abandoned before giving birth to my mother
and giving her up for adoption. This
brother had epilepsy. When I contacted
his daughter and we exchanged pictures of our brothers, she said, “Your brother
looks more like my father than my brothers do!”
The thrill of finding these “roots” was almost equaled to the thrill of
proving to my dismissive sister that I hadn’t been wrong and shouldn’t have
been so quickly dismissed.
But that was a factual matter. There’s usually no way of proving “insights,”
interpretations, or even memories. That
became evident when in 1986 we decided to have reunion for Daddy, who’d had
heart surgery the previous year. My
son Jonathan and I, Missy and her children, Suzy and her husband were gathering
with Dana, her husband and their two sons at her home in Chicago.
“This is my punishment for having
the biggest house, “said Dana, whose beautiful Victorian took up a whole block.
But I thought she’d soon feel better
about having us there because I’d found the perfect gift for her. At a time when there wasn’t the plethora of
movies now available in DVDs, I had found a video (VHS) of White
Christmas, a movie we had seen one magical Christmas shortly after moving
to Iowa, where our family was staying in a motel until our house was ready for
us. She and I had seen a lot of musicals
together—many of them at the Idaho State Hospital, where our father was Chief
Psychologist. Among the “perks” of his
job were free rent on our house, discounts at the commissary, and complimentary
tickets to the Friday night movies the patients saw, many of which were
musicals. But that Christmas our parents
drove us to a movie theatre near the town square where the snow and lights gave
everything an enchanted glow, and we got to see that wonderful movie, White Christmas twice! There was even a funny song about sisters.
“Lord, help the mister who comes between me and my sister, and Lord, help the
sister who comes between me and my man.”
I associated that show with one of the brightest Christmases in our
childhood, brightened considerably by that musical that kept playing over and
over in my mind, helping drown out the sound of very bitter, very noisy fights
between our parents.
So when I presented the video, I
was startled by my sister’s reaction.
“Oh, yes! I remember that experience. Mother and Daddy drove us through all kinds
of slush and dumped us off at some crummy little movie theatre because they
wanted to be alone, and they made us see that movie twice. They abandoned us. I remember how miserable I felt.”
Clearly, even when it comes to
magical MGM movie musicals, no two children hear the same songs.
Our different reactions to the visit
with Mom can be explained. Dana’s
“Awful” came because she hadn’t seen Mom since the worst of her dementia. She hadn’t been there when Mom was stabbing
her Mother’s Day cake and shoving ice cream into her mouth to protect us from
the poison she’d take upon herself.
Dana hadn’t talked to the Aegis care-givers the day after Mom paced
frantically through the halls all night, breaking the glass in fire
extinguisher boxes to call for help.
Dana’s “Awful” was in comparison to how she knew our mother in her
pre-dementia days. My “Good” was
relative to all the visits over a couple of years including our mother’s months
at Aegis.
But probably no two children
experience the same moment the same way, so I’m pretty certain that that no two
children within a family have the same two parents.
So that’s the background.
Then just as I was mentioning Dana’s
call to get contact info for Aunt Virginia, my iPhone rang and “Dana” appeared
on screen. Her son Wes had an unexpected
stay-over in SF from Aspen to Houston.
He’d be in the area until midnight.
Wes prompted a rare phone call from
Dana—one I still have on my phone—when she left the message, “The baby I gave
up for adoption walked into the adoption agency and said he wanted to meet his
mother.”
No comments:
Post a Comment