The best thing about the Save CCSF rally today was that it kept me on campus for 1 and 1/2 hours after class, and a once-close friend came by and of her own free will chatted with me for a while. I showed her an essay that was, supposedly, written in class but that sounded like a Google translation.
My opinion of Hermansons' verdict were found guilty in the death of their daughter, which I agree. The rason is what the people neglize their members of family to be unrresposiblity, specially at the chidlren. At the time of people are going to marry and planning have their childdren, new resposibility is begining in their life they should receive varied information from several situations for their chidlren care skill before they do. For examle in the case of Hermansons. If they had received ill's treatmetn more than their treatment of religious what they knew, Am Hermanson mgiht have saved her life. None methold is 100% protection but Hermansons should choose one of most effected to cure her dauaghter'.
The law limites some over hurt action of religious or personal spirituted sometime. Existing hospital is first choosing for people have sick. Hermansons love her daughter than may was truly. if htye had gone to shopital first, they might not have found gitly. The coul dtake Amy to hsopital first and prayed at the same time.
Hermanos were found guilty what made a good example for some people memorias things what should first time to do.
Uh....I'll proofread tomorrow.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't think this is the kind of community-provided bench the SF Chronicle was talking about today in its article https://www.sfchronic...
-
I'm just back from The Legion of Honor, where some friends and I saw the Louvre collection amassed by Louis XIV-Louis XVI--proof... -
I had the vague recollection that Charlie Sava, whose eponymous pool is across the street from me, was a coach, and I finally got around to ...
No comments:
Post a Comment